<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Unfaithful Sinner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://annasbones.com/2009/02/17/sinner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://annasbones.com/2009/02/17/sinner/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on bones, evolution and everything in between - by Anna Barros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:07:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: annabones</title>
		<link>http://annasbones.com/2009/02/17/sinner/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[annabones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annasbones.wordpress.com/?p=694#comment-423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was well said and well explained. I agree with you on many levels.
While I do have my grievances with organized forms of religion and the loss of the individual self to forms of communautarism (which I see as dangerous and potentially leading to all sorts of evil), a personal quest of god (or whatever you want to call it) seems quite reasonable and nice even. In fact, humans have been searching for this experience for many millennia, since even before Jesus and the Bible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was well said and well explained. I agree with you on many levels.<br />
While I do have my grievances with organized forms of religion and the loss of the individual self to forms of communautarism (which I see as dangerous and potentially leading to all sorts of evil), a personal quest of god (or whatever you want to call it) seems quite reasonable and nice even. In fact, humans have been searching for this experience for many millennia, since even before Jesus and the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://annasbones.com/2009/02/17/sinner/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annasbones.wordpress.com/?p=694#comment-417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to start by saying that i found your blog very interesting and i like the passion behind your writing.

I think the reason that the &#039;There&#039;s probably no God&#039; advert provoked a response from Christians is that, unlike the &#039;Islam is peace&#039; advert, it made a direct statement of &#039;probable fact&#039; which attacks what they believe. I don&#039;t agree with the response (coming back with a &#039;There definitely is a God&#039; advert), as i don&#039;t think attacking back was the right approach, but I can see why they wanted to respond.

I agree with your statement that life is full of surprises and that we should rejoice in that, but i do believe that there are certainties in life, even if not all of them can be proven or explained. At the risk of sounding provocative, how can we be certain that there are no certainties? Aren&#039;t life and death (and taxes!) certainties? 

I am a Christian and personally I don&#039;t feel that the &#039;probability&#039; of there being no God shakes my faith at all. For me the fact that i cannot prove it actually strengthens my faith as it says in the Bible that accepting God requires a step of faith, which means that it cannot be proven beforehand.

However, having made that step i feel i can now talk about the existence of God with certainty because i have experienced him. Obviously I can&#039;t prove to anyone else that I have experienced him, but i can encourage them to seek this experience themselves.

If you&#039;ve already made up your mind then fair enough, but if you are genuinely exploring these matters and looking for the truth then i would recommend a book called &#039;The Case for Christ&#039; by Lee Strobel.

Thanks again for the blog and i hope you found my thoughts helpful or at least interesting - I&#039;m no theologian, professor, lecturer or even blogger, just a 19-year-old guy who has experienced the God who changes lives.

All the best, 

Jamie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to start by saying that i found your blog very interesting and i like the passion behind your writing.</p>
<p>I think the reason that the &#8216;There&#8217;s probably no God&#8217; advert provoked a response from Christians is that, unlike the &#8216;Islam is peace&#8217; advert, it made a direct statement of &#8216;probable fact&#8217; which attacks what they believe. I don&#8217;t agree with the response (coming back with a &#8216;There definitely is a God&#8217; advert), as i don&#8217;t think attacking back was the right approach, but I can see why they wanted to respond.</p>
<p>I agree with your statement that life is full of surprises and that we should rejoice in that, but i do believe that there are certainties in life, even if not all of them can be proven or explained. At the risk of sounding provocative, how can we be certain that there are no certainties? Aren&#8217;t life and death (and taxes!) certainties? </p>
<p>I am a Christian and personally I don&#8217;t feel that the &#8216;probability&#8217; of there being no God shakes my faith at all. For me the fact that i cannot prove it actually strengthens my faith as it says in the Bible that accepting God requires a step of faith, which means that it cannot be proven beforehand.</p>
<p>However, having made that step i feel i can now talk about the existence of God with certainty because i have experienced him. Obviously I can&#8217;t prove to anyone else that I have experienced him, but i can encourage them to seek this experience themselves.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve already made up your mind then fair enough, but if you are genuinely exploring these matters and looking for the truth then i would recommend a book called &#8216;The Case for Christ&#8217; by Lee Strobel.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the blog and i hope you found my thoughts helpful or at least interesting &#8211; I&#8217;m no theologian, professor, lecturer or even blogger, just a 19-year-old guy who has experienced the God who changes lives.</p>
<p>All the best, </p>
<p>Jamie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Daedalus</title>
		<link>http://annasbones.com/2009/02/17/sinner/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Daedalus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annasbones.wordpress.com/?p=694#comment-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jewishscientist, I appreciate your outlook, and I agree that science isn&#039;t the only route to knowledge. The corollary I would offer is that it has proven to be the best means of verifying and evolving concepts of fundamental principles, and complex systems. Millennia of faith and religion led to smart people going with their intuition, with their &quot;certainty&quot;, and we as a society were rewarded with such gems as Phrenology, and Sanitariums. 

I&#039;ll tell you just what House would about our wife... you&#039;ll find her, you&#039;ll be certain, but until the day you die in each others&#039; arms; the possibility exists that she&#039;ll cease to be who you want. The odds are against you after all... 

None of this matters however, because faith IS, or ISN&#039;T. You can argue close to faith, but it doesn&#039;t have clean margins, and we all have some of it. The best we can hope to do is accept our human condition and move forward on that basis, as philosophical skeptics, trying to enrich the base of human knowledge in the hope that at some point it will allow us to rise above the constraints the faithful would have accept as fate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jewishscientist, I appreciate your outlook, and I agree that science isn&#8217;t the only route to knowledge. The corollary I would offer is that it has proven to be the best means of verifying and evolving concepts of fundamental principles, and complex systems. Millennia of faith and religion led to smart people going with their intuition, with their &#8220;certainty&#8221;, and we as a society were rewarded with such gems as Phrenology, and Sanitariums. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you just what House would about our wife&#8230; you&#8217;ll find her, you&#8217;ll be certain, but until the day you die in each others&#8217; arms; the possibility exists that she&#8217;ll cease to be who you want. The odds are against you after all&#8230; </p>
<p>None of this matters however, because faith IS, or ISN&#8217;T. You can argue close to faith, but it doesn&#8217;t have clean margins, and we all have some of it. The best we can hope to do is accept our human condition and move forward on that basis, as philosophical skeptics, trying to enrich the base of human knowledge in the hope that at some point it will allow us to rise above the constraints the faithful would have accept as fate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angellaa</title>
		<link>http://annasbones.com/2009/02/17/sinner/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angellaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annasbones.wordpress.com/?p=694#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, very cognitive post. 
Is this theme good unough for the Digg?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, very cognitive post.<br />
Is this theme good unough for the Digg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annabones</title>
		<link>http://annasbones.com/2009/02/17/sinner/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[annabones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annasbones.wordpress.com/?p=694#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing!
I&#039;m such a House fan.. did you see the last episode?.. I wrote this post while it was in the background. How appropriate it ended up being ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing!<br />
I&#8217;m such a House fan.. did you see the last episode?.. I wrote this post while it was in the background. How appropriate it ended up being <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

